Private Wealth & Family Law Practice Group
Domestic Violence Divorce: Safe Separation and Child Support via Media…
2026-05-08
1. Facts and Background
During the marriage, Client A (the plaintiff) had suffered physical and mental
harm from repeated violence by the spouse, B (the defendant), and decided to
bring an action for divorce for the safety and healthy development of the
children. Client A felt fear of any direct contact with B and concern about her
economic independence after divorce — particularly the securing of child
support. Given that the joint marital assets were limited and that little
economic benefit could realistically be expected from the division of marital
property, the securing of child support was the principal issue capable of
determining the outcome.
2. Key Legal Issues
The main issues were: (i) how to organize and demonstrate, in a systematic
manner, that the marital breakdown was the result not of ordinary marital
conflict but of repeated violence, and how to design the procedural approach so
that Client A could safely participate in the mediation process; (ii) how to
analyze precisely B's level of income, potential earning capacity, and the
children's age-specific educational costs, so as to present a realistic and
specific child-support calculation; and (iii) given the limited divisible
assets, how to construct the mediation proposal in such a way as to focus B's
attention on the child-support obligation and encourage cooperation.
3. Implementation and Outcome
LKP (i) systematically organized the circumstances of the domestic-violence
harm suffered by Client A to clarify the allocation of fault for the marital
breakdown, and gave priority to managing the procedural conduct of the
mediation so that Client A would not feel under psychological pressure; (ii)
precisely analyzed B's level of income, potential earning capacity, and the
children's age-specific educational costs, and presented a realistic and
specific child-support calculation; and (iii) given the limited divisible
assets, constructed and steered the mediation proposal to focus B on the
child-support obligation, maximizing Client A's practical economic interests.
The matter was concluded by mediation: Client A was safely separated from B in
legal and physical terms and obtained a level of child support sufficient to
raise the children with stability, establishing a foundation for a new daily
life. The case shows the design of a child-support-centered negotiation strategy
where the divisible assets are limited.






